![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/7fdde904-8a4d-4db8-88c7-22715e8cd8db.webp)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5170ed37-415d-42be-a3e7-3edd79eda681.png)
“We” don’t exist, or rather “we” don’t know what makes us “us”, except for what we do know. Consciousness isn’t fully understood.
I try things on the internet.
rarely, shit just works.
“We” don’t exist, or rather “we” don’t know what makes us “us”, except for what we do know. Consciousness isn’t fully understood.
Signed by whom? The CA.
The CA is the certificate authority.
You can create your own CA and sign your own certs for free, but people would need to have your CA root cert in their browser for them to be able to trust your signed certs.
Let’s Encrypt is a real CA bundled with browsers, and it signs free cert signing requests when specific criteria is met. This is done because TLS is an important privacy mechanism that works best if many certs are in use and not just a few wildcard certs.
Why not trust self-signed certs? Because there are no checks. When miicrosoft.com (the people who make the miis on your wii) gets a free cert signing from Let’s Encrypt, its because the owner of miicrosoft.com proved that they owned the domain miicrosoft.com by means of a lets encrypt / acme challenge. When you create your own CA and sign your own certs you are beholden to your own rules. You could sign a free cert for microsoft.com (the people who make minecraft) but then you would also need to convince users to install your CA, and then you can steal their blocks and grief their builds.
Now you get to decide where the bus goes!
My point still stands.
Not all of them are! I could contribute to the code base right now and I don’t have an instance.
1 contributor’s opinion and the existence of one community does not an argument make.
the devs don’t care about laws, if you want to put it so broadly, because the devs aren’t the ones who would get in trouble here, anyway. instance owners would likely catch the most trouble, especially because you can also add your own gdpr compliance if you want to.
also most devs aren’t facebook. most devs don’t really care too much about tracking users. the commercial sector on the other hand…
I’m sorry, but I think we’ve fallen victim to Poe’s Law here. Fret not, I understand the concept well, I was just cosplaying as someone who did not, laregly out of frustration for mankind’s dependency on centralized services.
But then how will I know which instance is the real one and not the impostor? What if I join an itailian instance, will I be the impasta?
I don’t even know man this shit is so confusing. I used to just comment and upvote when I saw shit I liked but now how will I know if the shit I liked came from one server or another. This is just madness we can’t keep treating people this way!
And you know the first thing devs do when they start writing code? They look up laws drafted by non technical people to ensure they are fully in compliance. The priority of lemmy all this time has been GDPR compliance, the fact that the app looks and functions similar to reddit is an afterthought.
Lemmy was created before GDPR.
Volunteers probably have not implemented GDPR and may not, or might.
Do you have a favorite server brand or motherboard you like to use in the data center?
I am an american but i think it works like this:
We don’t have these things here. Except for expensive bikes, that’s all we have. That’s why I got these boltcutters…
It looks like you have two free bikes in front of you. I wonder if they float in the river.
Self promotion in order to be hired so that they can eat food and survive.
Edit: y’all don’t have jobs? I’m not saying it works, I am saying they do it to stay employed.
Great idea, now how do we do that? Cities gentrify and force people into towns and rural areas. Where do these people get to live, the unincorporated wilderness?
The only real answer I have to that question is that leftists need to move to rural areas and help slowly change its political landscape. Or you know, let the elected official govern. Still, I don’t have an answer for this exact scenario. The ultimate problem is who (who have the power to do anything in that exact area) cares? We do, but we aren’t there and I am out of ideas.
You seem to be missing the point of decentralization.
And if we have a gun problem its not a gun problem its a mental health problem. If we have a mental health problem then its not my problem. Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to buy another gun to protect myself. No, I don’t have a mental health problem. Hoarding guns is the american way!