A title is just something a company calls a particular job. A role is what that job actually is. So a lot of jobs might be called “QA engineer”, but not fitting the intended role
A title is just something a company calls a particular job. A role is what that job actually is. So a lot of jobs might be called “QA engineer”, but not fitting the intended role
I’m thinking of it not as a title, but a role. Often times the 2 are not related
That’s what QA engineering is for. They are integrated into the dev team and they pull double duty with QA and code review.
I think QA engineering needs to become more widespread. The “extra pair of eyes” can’t compare to a department of people dedicated to code review and testing.
He better go publish his medical history and a psyche eval in the next few days
Create a file handler class to avoid the issue
Just like all storms, the geomagnetic storm scale is imperfect. It maxes out at G5, so it’s possible for a substantially worse storm to be in the same category as what we saw last weekend.
I had to look it up, the Carrington Event was a solar flare that impacted the entire globe and caused telegraph stations to set on fire in the 1800s. It’s the biggest magnetic storm in recorded history, and would lead to global devastation if another one that size impacted Earth due to our reliance on electronics
Cheap electric vehicles aren’t allowed, apparently.
look, that acorn was an immediate and present danger to those officers’ lives! Gotta teach those trees while they’re young to respect authority
(If it wasn’t somehow clear, /s)
They’ll still pull guns on the truffles, but better than them pulling guns on peaceful protestors.
Someone has to bite the bullet and ask the obvious questions. Everybody starts somewhere and learns at their own pace, so there’s probably dozens more with the same problem but too afraid to ask.
Same as it ever was, all across the world. Everyone just accepts the status quo, but if progressives are elected and the problems aren’t immediately solved then it’s back to the shit show from before
I don’t know why, but this is absolutely hilarious to me
All of these studies are extensively peer reviewed. What source do you have that proves they are unreliable? Let’s pretend that it’s true, what purpose is served by fabricating this data?
Alfalfa is a highly water intensive crop. The alfalfa being grown in the southwest is almost entirely exported.
Let’s trade sources. Here are mine.
Edit: I also did the work for you and checked some of the references in those sources. Here’s the 1986 landmark surgeon general report.
Body odor doesn’t increase the likelihood of cancer for the people around you.
In this situation, it’s actually growing alfalfa in an arid climate because water access from the river is use-it-or-lose-it based on an imaginary amount of water that don’t exist.
I have a sneaking suspicion that ozma has no control over what NYT chooses to publish.