Yeah but I bet you do it sometimes on your own pull requests even after you’ve opened them don’t you?
Yeah but I bet you do it sometimes on your own pull requests even after you’ve opened them don’t you?
Plenty of my real friends are people I used to work with back before I was married and stopped getting as much out of this sort of culture… There doesn’t need to be some hard line here - just because you work with people doesn’t mean you can’t be friends
I think you’ve got a point here, in that the sort of Devs who want to be able to refactor their code without breaking everything are also going to be the group who lean more into having code that actually runs quite fast; but given that reasonML is awesome and didn’t get much mindshare my position here is that wasm will only start to eat into tyspecript’s lunch well after a huge subset of TS can be compiled to wasm (or maybe python ((I blame the xkcd guy for python’s unreasonable popularity, I feel it’s hugely overrated))).
Code as given can be made valid in scala I believe. My starter was based on that assumption. I think raku can do it too, but you would probably have to \x = $
to make it work…
Edit: misread your comment slightly, CBA to change mine now. It is what it is
I could’ve used a lot of things, but I’m on my phone and I wanted fewer characters to render it, whilst being sure it would work without having to run it.
Also, I am pleased to have maybe helped. Perhaps we can be friends, you and I. Perhaps not. Idk, maybe you punch dogs, why would you do that? Seems mean.
Have you ever just, like, edited a comment? How do people know when you did it? I guess if I were writing a thing to check it I’d use a registry of timestamps and checksums… So, like, ok, you can track, but why, how does it look?
Anyway sorry I had some drinks between now and first post, goodnight
deleted by creator
Implicit was too much of a give away wasn’t it?
They missed out the context code:
trait DoW { def length: FiniteDuration }
object Monday extends DoW { override def length = 24.hours }
...
implicit def toDoW(s: String): DoW = s match {
case "Monday" => Monday
...
}
var day: DoW = _
(Duration formatting and language identification are left as an exercise for the reader)
Absolutely not true. I know this is just my experience, but I’ve worked with plenty of devs who’ve contributed prs and/or donations back to OSS projects in the past, and all my former employers have opensourced at least some of their software
Hypertext markup Language. Yeah this sorta reminds me of why I stopped following r/ProgrammerHumour on the old site - too many cheap potshots at Perl, PHP and HTML, as if they weren’t fantastic tools that powered the creation of the internet we have today. Kids, man, SMH
Honestly I really miss the Reddit programming subreddits (never went back after they shut down RiF) but I was usually just a lurker there. There are certain things I’d weigh in on,.and some things I wouldn’t, and if you’ve not got much content I guess a lot of ppl like me just won’t engage… Really it’s a chicken-and-egg problem though – if people are having interesting conversations here about Rust, some people will probably come to follow them and contribute; but you won’t get the interesting conversations if the people aren’t here. So maybe convincing people from other communities to have their chats here is the requirement. In terms of practical things do do? I dunno. Maybe linking to the occasional GitHub (drama or feature) is probably an easy thing that someone could do to get some conversations going for example maybe? But as I said, lurker mostly. Not really my thing to come up with posts…
The people who do the cleaning
I find that code way too fun to write to let someone or something else do it for me 😂
‘$searchTerm def’ on any search engine
Hey, I was going that way too tbf
I mean, it’s red in the middle. That’s not normal for a kiwi. Big fan, never seen these
Eyyyyyyyy
Onion has always been very good at criticism of US gun control laws. Lot of pieces on that
I know you’re playing the straight man to a joke, but actually you can apply a linter, then tell GitHub to ignore the implied ownership history for the purposes of blame from that reclining pr. All such prs are massive and yet by virtue of the replayability of the linter it’s also very easy to ensure errors didn’t slip in when reviewing.
I know the original comment was about renaming all the variables, but that’s obviously deliberately absurd, so I’m using here a completely realistic example instead.