![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/c83cc78d-d65f-452f-9e9b-90fb83eb8343.jpeg)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/170721ad-9010-470f-a4a4-ead95f51f13b.png)
F# definitely and maybe Haskell and OCaml as well? Elixir and Erlang use it as a binary concatenation operator.
Mastodon: @sean@dice.camp
F# definitely and maybe Haskell and OCaml as well? Elixir and Erlang use it as a binary concatenation operator.
You’re downvoted, but you’re 100% right. The web is designed to not break. Engineers who can’t accept that don’t get to complain
True, but functional languages are great if you want to live comfortably.
https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#section-salary-salary-and-experience-by-language
JavaScript has [
].length
Pretty easy to set up a remote for GitHub in Gitea.
Love typst! I’m looking forward to writing RPGs in it some day :)
Refusing PureScript and Haskell is a signal that you don’t care about code quality.
My point was that it’s pretty much impossible to indent with tabs in lisp. It’ll be harder to read and scan for everyone else who has a different tab with. How you indent and what you want to indent to is very different compared to a c-style language.
laughs in lisp
Nah, I’ll keep on sticking with spaces or whatever the language’s formatter uses. Ain’t no way am I mixing tabs and spaces, will just stick with spaces.
Compile times say otherwise