![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/82a6a5eb-4c2c-4cbb-b146-93ae2f99269b.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Cannon fodder, dirt tobacco, flank meat, dollar store dishware, expendable.
Just trying to do some cool shit with people and have fun and respectful. **Feel free to give me shit if I’m being unduly rude or disrespectful and point to this bio.
Cannon fodder, dirt tobacco, flank meat, dollar store dishware, expendable.
Because we have yet to kill off the idea that
“my group is the best and perfect because I’m in it”
Of course it’s Texas.
Because none of it loaded for the mobile view on my iPhone, didn’t expect it to be a bug with the website.
Things didn’t need to get hostile, you had no need calling names and throwing around stereotypes. You took my viewpoint of the article some random person wrote and took it personally.
I can’t help you with your anger dude, I’m sorry.
In fact, prior to reading the offending comment, I was pretty open to your comment citing the science and nature articles.
Over an article about corn enrichment.
This might be the case, the mobile view that pops up is a a few paragraphs of 1-2 sentences each, really just introductory stuff. This is my guess as to what’s going on, thanks for commenting
Pretty simple, you’re not telling the full story of the statistics.
About 40% of corn produced is for biofuels
36% is used as animal feed
Furthermore, the US exported nearly $20 billion dollars worth of said corn for 2021.
Much of the corn usage in food is for high fructose corn syrup, which, as you can imagine, is different from eating sweet corn for dinner.
Corn isn’t used primarily for feeding people, it’s for fuel, animal feed, and garbage additives. Change my mind please.
Cool stereotyping bro. Post some more articles with crap for sources and crap for writing and surprise pikachu when people ask for actual data and good information.
Classic asshole.
Beautiful explanation and data to boot. Appreciate the time you took to politely correct my misunderstanding. Appreciate it!
Now we’re cookin, would’ve rather read the science or nature articles over a local news resource any day. It’s so easy to pop up “news sites” and push them as authority figures
It’s a shit article, the “scientific detail” makes no sense, is this an attempt to spread malware/spyware or just clickbait/analytics boosting
Edit: corn is most definitely digestible, and because of its common usage in many commercial food products, we could improve these nutrient areas allegedly.
Ignore: … of all the edible things in the world.
They chose corn. Which barely gets digested.
What am I missing here, this is way too obviously strange to me, gotta be missing something.
But seriously: This article has like 3 sentences, why the fuck was this posted lmao.
Wasn’t an attempt to “destroy you” but go off with your dramatic self!
….wonder what the privacy policy is like. Your iris is one of few unique biometric signatures your body has.
deleted by creator
Nah, just calling out an attention addict
What does any of what you just said have to do with the US making a pledge to increase global energy sustainability (energy and fossil fuels specifically being the crux of global catastrophe)
Sometimes I think posters just like to jab for rage bait
This person gets it
Arguing pedantics = conversational way of saying that you are being pedantic.
Define terrorism not war crimes, obviously. Nobody was arguing for the definition of war crimes, and just because something isn’t a formal war crime, doesn’t mean it’s not something else (which would possibly include but not limit to only terrorism)
Okay so you’re arguing pedantics. Let’s do it.
Can you find any official global sources that define terrorism vs an act of war?
I couldn’t but I only checked for a short while.
ecosystem collapses anyway and crab dies from heat death