You’ve discovered an artifact!! Yaaaay
If you ask GPT to do this in a more math questiony way, itll break it down and do it correctly. Just gotta narrow top_p and temperature down a bit
You’ve discovered an artifact!! Yaaaay
If you ask GPT to do this in a more math questiony way, itll break it down and do it correctly. Just gotta narrow top_p and temperature down a bit
I think it’s okay to pity the conditions that make us flawed humans. Doesn’t make it justification, but to acknowledge the vulns we have as people and actively work on them is to evolve and climb the steps of Great Filter.
The difference is that mine was used to further illustrate your childish/immature (ironic, no?) nature, which you flawlessly glided into.
Saying someone is too young to run for president when they’re a couple years younger than the average age… makes sense. Let’s have someone with ideals they grew in the early 2000/90s/80s run the country in 2024. Makes sense only when you yourself are in that bucket.
Not at all what I meant. The premise was that this wouldn’t happen if they were being paid fairly. Supply chain attacks happen with or without fair pay.
Look at what happened with the XZ backdoor. Whether or not they’re getting paid just means a different door is opened.
The root of the problem is that we blindly trust anyone based on name-brand and popularity. That has never in the existence of technology been a reliable nor an effective means of authentication.
If it’s not outright buying out companies it will be vulnerabilities/lack of appropriate management, if it’s not vulns it’ll be insider threat.
These are problems we’ve known about for at least a decade+ and we’ve done fuck all to address the root of the problem.
Never trust, always verify. Simple as that.
… he made plenty off the product and made additional when he sold. Devs ability to make money has nothing to do with companies coming in and injecting malware to the service.
Any threat actor group with sufficient funds from various campaigns, spyware, etc could use said funds to buy out a dev, owner, etc.
Not to mention state-sponsored threat actors. This is the perfect example of distracting from the fact of what happened.
Good catch! Missed that one
For anyone interested - I’d you are using umatrix to block shit you can punch these lines into a new text file and import as blocklist, then commit it with the tiny arrow that points left toward the permanent list to save it permanently:
* www[.]googie-anaiytics[.]com * block
* kuurza[.]com * block
* cdn[.]polyfill[.]io * block
* polyfill[.]io * block
* bootcss[.]com * block
* bootcdn[.]net * block
* staticfile[.]org * block
* polyfill[.]com * block
* staticfile[.]net * block
* unionadjs[.]com * block
* xhsbpza[.]com * block
* union[.]macoms[.]la * block
* newcrbpc[.]com * block
Remove the square brackets before saving the file - these are here to prevent hyperlinks and misclicks.
Edit: this is not a bulleted list, every line must start with an asterisk, just in case your instance doesn’t update edits made to comments quickly.
Edit2: added new IOCs
Edit3: MOAR IOCS FOR THE HOARDE
This has almost nothing to do with what you’re talking about.
A Chinese company bought the domain and the service in February and are attacking people in highly specific conditions. (Mobile devices at specific times)
This is an attack. Not negligence, not an uh oh oopsie woopsie fucky wucky. Attack.
Intuit uses pollyfill… and a lot of people use that service.
Cloudflare and fastly wouldn’t be setting up mirrors if it weren’t still being used, I can guarantee that.
Not quite!
Try:
mylist = [value for value in range(1,20)]
This says I want to make mylist be a list where each element of the list (called value here) comes from doing a for loop on range, given the parameters 1, and 20.
If you want to change how each element of this list is, you do it in the first bit on “value”
So you could do
mylist = [value*5 for value in range(1,20)] //5,10,15,…,95 (not 100, because ranges go up to the last item, not including it (non-inclusive))
Etc. Hope this makes sense!
Edit: MISSING CLOSING PARENTHESIS DOH
Came here to look for this comment - bad science communication is the reigning supreme it would seem these days
I’m still waiting for modular phones to be more mainstream. Tired of the ewaste. Tired of the anti consumer practices. Tired of planned obsolescence.
Blah blah blah blah
Bureaucracy Bureaucracy Bureaucracy
Stamp stamp stamp
You’ll see more and more to a certain extent too, as it becomes more normal and, namely safe, to be trans.
Don’t let anyone convince you anyones “becoming” trans. Always have been, always will be
Anything to avoid the real problems ig
Is this satire or