subignition

You should forget anything you’ve read in this thread and play Outer Wilds ASAP. And you should go into it as blind as possible. Trust me; you only get to experience it for the first time once.

A new planet in a distant orbit, you say?
In before the signal is older than the universe itself.

I hardly dream so I guess I would say “it’s a dream when I wake up afterwards”

For accuracy, it should be updated to read “Snitches will need stitches.”

… :(

I believe they said “eat the rich”

A handcar!

Toss a coin, to your admins…

Go home Tucker, you’re drunk.

I don’t doubt that he was an accident

Kinda sounds like a format similar to Stack Exchange might work

There was a 1999 PC game called Drakan: Order of the Flame which was a pretty good time. Third-person action-adventure sword and sorcery that had some fun hidden secrets, a variety of weapons with different strengths, dragon riding… To expand on that, and probably make the protagonist a bit more realistically dressed, would be enjoyable

I mean considering any normal person is basically going to be bankrupted by a non frivolous lawsuit, I wouldn’t blame them for erring on the safe side even if they’re sure they’re in the right

I am not a lawyer: A guilty plea is an admission of guilt, so I believe you’re wrong about that, thankfully. Provided the specific crimes being discussed are the same ones that were plead to, I don’t think there is an issue here

That’s an unorthodox side dish to say the least, but I suppose beggars can’t be choosers.

I can’t believe that all this time I could have been getting my lunch for free at wikipedia.org

Well most replies already suggested a LLM but good old fashioned search skills work fine too.

For simple questions, as long as you know the correct terminology that is relevant, just asking the question of a search engine is usually good enough to turn up articles or stack overflow answers that’ll help

If you don’t know the terminology or you struggle to ask a precise question despite your knowledge, going up one level , so to speak, and consuming more information about the stuff in the immediate context, can often either fill in the gaps to allow you to ask the right question, or sometimes it’s the missing bit of info you didn’t know you needed to solve your actual problem.

I’ve said this for a long time, but we don’t even need to make radical changes to the tax code. I bet if we fix the loopholes so that companies can’t avoid paying the (21%) tax they are SUPPOSED TO BE paying with clever accounting, the extra $8+ billion annually would move mountains.

https://itep.org/55-profitable-corporations-zero-corporate-tax/

Not that radical changes to the tax code aren’t also a good idea.
edit: grammar

…Huh.

Guess we’re gonna hit the singularity soon or die trying

It’s a 15-minute old account, I’m sure they created it just to troll with.

As another commenter said, that’s because it’s not the official site!