Super cool project, thanks for sharing! I think I will try to integrate it with my static sites.

I am curious about the details of that conversation, because I remember reading Dev’s comments in some post on Lemmy where they mentioned this option.

One thing I have never understood and keep repeating in this context: Beehaw has >7k$ balance. If they really have a few issues that would solve 90% of the problems, why not putting a 500/1000/2000$ bounty of that feature.

Zelensky’s campaign was supported by a Ukrainian oligarch. Not exactly an “absolute outsider”. In fact, during the campaign the supporters of Poroshenko (who tend to be more nationalists) used this as ground to accuse him of being associated with Russia (among other things).

Yeah, that sounds even better.

wut?

personal data have not been obtained from the data subject

Reads to me like data that I (data subject) did not provide myself, but that the processor collects. I guess an example could be IP address.

I noticed it yesterday by chance!

Kagi is a really good product that I am very happy to support.

Ansible is definitely one way to do this. If your machines are VMs, then also building VM images with packer can be the way.

For tmux, vim, etc. You can still use ansible or some specific tool for dotfiles, like chezmoi (there are a bunch). You can even use ansible to run chezmoi!

I think the answer is fairly simpler, from my point of view: because NATO is not a military alliance among peers. It is the military arm of the American empire. This allows US to essentially manage the foreign policies of most of NATO members, but it also comes with the cost of being the one paying the bills. Empires are expensive.

I will skip commenting the rest because, well, you are entitled to your own opinion and you can loathe who you want. I would perhaps simply suggest to look at your own country with an outside perspective and realize that if everyone used your same logic, the world will be a more hateful place than already is.

Sure, but the conclusion is still the same: saying that Italy is a “fascist country” is bs.

“Italy” did not, a minority of people, who did for all kind of different reasons, did. A subset of those is probably a nostalgic.

Meloni’s party benefited from the fall of the other right wing parties. The core base which is probably what I would call fascists are probably close to the usual % her party was getting few years back: 3-5%.

Anyway, this has nothing to do with “being a fascist country”. Words have meaning, and a fascist country is a dictatorship in which freedom of press does not exist, where minorities and political opposition is systematically repressed, killed, silenced, etc. Thankfully, we are still very far from that.

If you read about this matter, you would know very well that the matter is way more complex than “he did not want to stand trial”. The whole matter is very well described by Stefania Maurizi (a journalist who cooperated with Wikileaks) in her book “Secret power”. Both the Swedish and the UK government have huge responsibilities on how (bad) that case was handled.

Meloni has still been voted by a minority of people, considering the incredibly low turnout in the last elections. “Fascist” country seems very much pulled from your ass, especially when talking about something started by the previous city government of Rome.

IDF soldiers have long been safe and secure in Israel without any pushback from residents. It’s time for them to reap the rewards of their support. If they still stand by the IDF, so be it.

This is your alter ego from across the border speaking.

It is well known that those are the only two options. Also, the problem here is that the task is not possible, according to UN personnel, not me or you. So this feels a lot as just a way to create plausible deniability by saying “we tried hard to spare civilians”.

Pretending to be talking about good and evil is defending murdering children. 300 children (according to The Guardian who quotes Palestine authorities) died from Israel strikes already. It’s not like killing in uniform and with “precision” strikes is less killing.

It is exactly both sides, although there are qualitative (hamas raids of innocents were somewhat more brutal and violent) and quantitative (many more palestinians dead) differences.

Then there is the whole historical analysis which is a whole other debate.

To be honest, I think they might be thinking about two different things. The article itself criticized the parroting of “this is 9/11” and explicitly decides to explain why it is Israel’s 9/11 but reaching obviously different conclusions that many that repeat the same thing.

Well, sure, but war crimes are war crimes.

Just to note, there are reports (I am following the Guardian’s blog) that IDF did not “roofknock” in at least one occasion yesterday, suggesting that maybe they stopped the practice. We have very little news from Gaza for obvious reasons though.