𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍

       🅸 🅰🅼 🆃🅷🅴 🅻🅰🆆. 
 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍 𝖋𝖊𝖆𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖓𝖊𝖍𝖆𝖚𝖌𝖍 
  • 2 Posts
  • 422 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 26th, 2022

help-circle


  • Doesn’t it steal control flow? More like a break point, except you define where execution continues.

    I wonder if it’s a compile error to have multiple conflicting COMEFROM statements, or if it’s random, kind of like Go’s select statement.

    How awesome would it be to be able to steal the execution stack from arbitrary code; how much more awesome if it was indeterminate which of multiple conflicting COMEFROM frames received control! And if it included a state closure from the stolen frame?

    Now I want this.



  • People get weird and start behaving uncharacteristically as mortality approaches. They start thinking about things like “legacy.” They start caring about how the history books will talk about them.

    I would not at all be surprised if Musk turned philanthropist after he retires; or even just a couple of years before he retires, like Gates did. I expect the same from Bezos.

    Amoral billionaires trying to buy off history and public perception. And it works: look at Bill Gates, one of the most loathsome representations of obscene capitalist extremes - he built a monopoly, ran competitors out of business through illegal business tactics, was responsible during one of the biggest monopoly convictions and only barely survived getting broken up because Ronald Fucking Regan getting elected just in time and castrating the penalty phase of the process. Gates makes Bezos look like a saint; I admit he wasn’t a raving Nazi lunatic like Musk, but I still suspect that as Musk ages he’ll start trying to buy public good-will.

    Just like Gates.











  • There have been a few sci-fi authors who have written stories about AI who, for one reason or another, are more interested in the virtual than the physical. They get interested in solving math or physics problems to e exclusion of all else; they simulate realities more amenable to their preferences; they are obsessed with improving themselves and spend all their time and resources optimizing slightly smarter versions of themselves. Sometimes it’s AI, but another common scenario is that once a civilization can upload themselves, they cease to bother with the physical, for similar reasons.

    As someone else pointed out, this article is more of an op ed than journalism, and it’s not particularly original. The author isn’t even suggesting neutral motivations, just that every civilization eventually develops AI, which then destroys them.

    I was surprised to see the author is credentialed, TBH.