Kalash

Would just be a body double, I don’t think he dares to go near the warzone.

I was just making a joke about a small country without an army, because the previous comment’s “challange” and wasn’t trying to make any furher points. I don’t even know why it escalted like this.

Right. I just seemed to have missed the part where the facebook leadership was forced into excile and has it’s assets siezed by a 20 year long revolution/war that ultimatily defeated facebook, established a country and than granted the ceo a token “company”, entirly at the mercy of the revolutionaries.

What a great analogy.

Charging a car isn’t exactly on the same scale as providing power to a large metropolitan area with heavy industries.

There just is no viable battery storage for that scale with current technology.

But the Papal States were different. The country of Vatican City as it exists today was only established in 1929.

The Vatican.

Boo! Boo Dutch police, boo!

Right… You know what can’t be regulated at all? The weather.

No? Why would even think that?

lol. No.

Yeah, both would be better. But if, for dumb political reasons, I had to choose one or the other, then it’s clearly gonna be nuclear. At least it’s viable as a singular source, which renewables would not be.

You do realise they still have to put warning labels on bleach so people don’t drink or inject it?

Yeah, maybe a tool that generates recipicts but has no concept of what eatable ingredents are, is not a good idea regardless of stupid users.

I agree, ideally you should do both in parallel. But it’s still better than doing a Germany and ditching nuclear for reneweables … and then realising you actually don’t have enough baseload so you add more coal power plants.

Why would we want broken stuff like this?

So the same as with renewables. Also who thought fighting climate change would be cheap?

There is enough thorium (which can be turned into uranium) in the earth crust to power humand kind for tens of thousand of years. It’s defacto renewable.

Good for Sweden, glad to see at least some contries have energy policies based in reality.

Or in other words: never.

What invaluable scientific insights might be lost because of this? Tragic.

Hard disagree here.

Religion at best needs to be tolerated, at least the parts that aren’t illegal.

But respected? No Sir.

Being free to believe what you want also includes people believing your believes are stupid.

You want a less hurtful and divisive world? Great! Let’s start by getting rid of religions, which are easily the most divisive social constructs in human history. We’re literally still fighting wars over them.