Liz losing hers would be gold too
update July 5th 0700h: oh happy day
Liz losing hers would be gold too
update July 5th 0700h: oh happy day
Monetary cost is the wrong y-axis here, as it optimizes only for mega-scale farming without taking its real costs in consideration. It should be ‘true cost’, which also accounts for environmental-, animal- and climate mitigation cost.
They can also block Hungary from exercising its voting rights, essentially suspending their EU membership. But not kicking them out altogether
It always sounds better in the original German
Ah yes, another “Hamas base” I’m sure
Surely Slartibartfast doesn’t approve
English winemakers (yes, they exist…) who will now sell a pint of wine at the cost of a 0,75l bottle
To those downvoting this, you’ve learned nothing from recent history. China has been a “legal” nuclear power forever, and it has the right to do as it pleases. Just like the US does.
Unsubstantiated, tendentious, insinuating talk about ‘secretive’ nuclear things echoes Powells lies to the UN about Iraq. It’s again the US again manufacturing consent to whip up more anti-China sentiment, only to further its own goals.
That was a mistake even back then
Bla bla bla
So is this what they call a ‘general failure’?
‘Privitazation’, so that his friends and other (Russian?) oligarchs can buy them. Great plan. What could possibly go wrong?
It’s not a perk. Don’t reinforce their framing
That’s a feature, not a bug. Using geo-engineering will take the pressure off of fossil fuel reduction policies. So why use solar power when you can happily continue burning coal and oil?
Given that energy usage also increases about quadratically, this means that net CO2 emissions will roughly remain equal till 2060.
This is not a good graph.