

And here’s the kicker: the way climate models work is by predicting the next timeframe based on the previous one. Because of this, your “statistically irrelevant” error becomes larger and larger with each prediction, as the next prediction will be based on these small errors.
Which would be an issue if new models weren’t being made and refined
if you want to trust the GISP2 data)
The poor interpretation of that data you mean?
or around 7970BC (if you want to go with the multi-core reconstruction method). Plants and animals are still here, aren’t they?
So around the time of the Quaternary extinction event.
Again you seem to be arguing that just because not everything died it’s ok that a lot of stuff died.
To government: tax the hell of them
To private parking: only allow them in certain spaces (with big fines of their in other spaces) and charge them triple.