That kid is nothing but a prop human shield to him too.

I thought the glass was going to be unbearable or something.

Of course that’s the reason. It’s got nothing to do with him being a lazy cunt.

Should we ban pubs from having car parks? Since the exhaust fumes are quite toxic.

No, but we should ban the sale of new ICE cars (and in so doing begin a complete phase out) for those reasons and because they’re damaging to the wider environment.

Oh, look we are.

As others have pointed out, 40 year tech still beat current tech.

Ent and lower decks often get skipped, everything else occasionally.

Prodigy, never. That theme is up there with Voy and DS9.

Eye watering fines for the company (say 25% of global turnover) and the ceo’s of said companies should be held personally liable and receive eye watering fines (25% of net worth). Would help plug the hole in the budget the Tories left too.

You’re going to fall foul of anti money laundering checks very hard and fast. There’s no way you’d be able to buy property, let alone in a month.

Hey, Prodigy is great. Of course they tried to cancel it.

Plus, having a bag is fucking revolutionary. I used to empty a cyclone type vac pretty much every time I used it, complete with clouds of dust. Henry every few months I have to take the bag out and pop in a new one. No mess, no fuss. Plus, the bags have filters in them, so no having to clean the filters under the tap (again getting dusty) and wait a couple of days for them to dry.

They also had to russle up a lot of candidates and hope to hell that no dirt was dragged up about them because there wasn’t time to vet them.

You need to have people to nominate the candidate

10 per candidate. However, they could easily have just been given the name and told that’s who they were nominating.

to be handed in by either the election agent or the candidate themselves.

Unlike voting don’t need to present ID to be a candidate. So a couple of people could have made their way around presenting papers.

That’s a shame. I was hoping for jail time for the leadership.

What would be the legal consequences for reform and their leadership if it is found that they have done this?

The article says that’s what reform is claiming they were.

The concern is that they were not even that. If they’ve just put names down without actually finding a real people to go behind them then it’s open and shut electoral fraud.

Two easy fixes, random orders on the ballots. Or the top option is always “None of the below”.

I think this election proves we need two major changes:

1. PR so everyone is equally represented whether we like them or not.

2. Australian style mandatory voting. My betting is that a lot of people who would have voted labour this election stayed home because of how much the media showed it was on the bag for labour.

Luckily the exit poll was wrong. Still worrying that they got 4 seats.

Hopefully if Frog Face does try his takeover the Tories will split, and the ones that aren’t racist, climate change denier economically incompetent idiots will either form their own party or join the lib Dems.

33% Green

33% Labour

33% Lib Dem

So I’m off to stopthetories.vote I guess too see if it’s Lib dem or labour who’s most likely to overturn the 70% odd percentage majority my Tory MP has.

In politics (well under FPTP at least), like in the service you’re often forced to choose the lesser of two weevils.

We need PR. These super broad church parties don’t fit society. You should be able to vote for the party you want to be in power, rather than against the one you don’t want. The current Tory massive majority was won with around 43% of the vote. That should mean they have 43% of the representatives.