scientists don’t know the reasons behind this behavior
they want to be chased and tickled, wtf do you think
if you voted for Trump you’re going to Hell, and this is why… he looked like the Easy Way to you… you took the Easy Way, and that’s what you go to Hell for, you cowards…
if you’re a man and you voted for Trump, you’re a Momma’s Boy, just like Mike Pence and Bill O’Reilly… you were coddled…
and i don’t give a damn about any of you hellbound assholes… you can all rot…
momma’s boy: (n) a man who’s used to getting attention just because he threatens to throw a fit; see cunt
scientists don’t know the reasons behind this behavior
they want to be chased and tickled, wtf do you think
he doesn’t have an objective point, he’s just expressing the limitations of his own understanding… he’s a good model for a fascist that way… he assumes that his understanding is universal and should be applied to everyone…
his argument is never very good… viruses are incomplete beings in every sense we care about… the human being shares almost nothing in common with them conceptually… we cooperate and care about each other in ways that are obviously not virus-like… even when we fight, it’s much more interesting that virus combat…
i know what you’re thinking, but it’s probably not a good idea to snort that
facts don’t care about your feelings
there are a lot of trolls, and they like to congregate… they hope that by bullying someone they can make bad facts disappear…
but it’s pretty obvious none of them have even made a serious trip to a university library
these new numbers clearly are now the best estimate we have
you go ahead and do your checking, little fella… be sure and let me know what your code has to say…
i didn’t say you were naturally stupid, just that you are using a stupid argument… it’s just a fact… if you don’t want me to point out the stupidity of your arguments, you shouldn’t use stupid argumentation…
maybe you’re a little defensive because you’re full of shit
that’s exactly how science comes into existence… one study and paper at a time… whoever taught you otherwise was lying or stupid…
you’re just making shit up, you have no idea what you’re talking about
you’ve obviously never read a scientific paper… if you understood anything about science, you would see that this method of determining sea temperature changes produces a dataset that is much more reliable than the data we have been referring to…
the scientific process is demonstrated in their paper… if you can find fault in their methods, then there is controversy, otherwise their findings are fact… “criticism” in science is done with research, not comments on the internet or to news outlets…
until someone finds a reason why this method might be unreliable, it isn’t controversial… it’s a scientific fact with implications…
i love this guy asking if it’s unethical to tell someone else fuck you… you haven’t grasped basic ethics if this is a question for you… do unto others as you would have them do unto you… you don’t even know how to put yourself in their shoes…
deleted by creator
sounds like Jordan got what he needed from it then
it’s a very complex situation, there are a lot of ins and outs
show a little sympathy and see what it gets you, nothing but snark
maybe you need a hug
maybe if they did a study