Dude, that has no bearing on my comment whatsoever. Just admit you just use “liberal” as a general purpose insult without thinking and move on.

What part of my original comment displayed a dogmatic adherence “liberal” ideology?

All that private property I didn’t mention? Or was it something else?

How about we take a break, you read what you posted, then we cycle back? Pay special attention to the paragraph you wrote that starts with “when threatened by populism”.

You understand how the thing you typed supports my position, not yours right?

Liberals have no “ideological purity”, other than “Money is good”. The rest are easily abandoned precepts at best, but more likely fake pretenses from the start.

I am asking you. And I’m asking a substantially more specific question than “what is liberalism”.

At least you could cite the relevant sections of that mammoth document.

Ok, let’s do this.

Can you please explain to me the tenets of the supposedly dogmatic ideology of “liberalism” as you understand them?

Long story short, they carry water for “the alt right”, aka the current rebrand of fucking Nazis.

Hold your horses pardner.

First of all, I didn’t comment on the merits of recycling plastic. I know it’s stupid. Everyone knows it’s stupid.

Second, the assertion that “To dismiss any information merely because it emanates from a source they disfavor is the epitome of liberalism” requires some seriously odd definition of “liberalism” to be true.

Third, quillette can go get very fucked all the way.

Fourth, “the epitome of liberalism, a testament to their steadfast commitment to ideological purity” is legit the funniest shit I’ve heard all week. You are accusing liberals of striving for ideological purity? Liberals?

We’re posting quillette now?

Jesus Christ how low we have sunk.

The solution to that is to buy a net block. IPV6 address space is very affordable.

A constructor can’t be async so now I need to restructure my code to use async factories instead of constructors

It sounds like you’re trying to do OOD/OOP. In js that’s usually not the way to go. You might want to restructure into a more functional architecture anyway.

Thus insisting on any other way is a major flaw in the developer not the language.

I mean, I understand the idea, but this is a pretty asshole way to frame it. I don’t think I deserve that, and certainly OP doesn’t deserve that.

From browsing your other comments on this thread I understand that you are in a context where you can’t await, that you expect the invocation to take very little time, and that the library offers no complementary sync interface.

As far was I know you’re stuck in this case. I consider the stubborn refusal to add “resolve this promise synchronously right now” a major flaw in js.

It’s standard for operations that take a while and can be performed asynchronously.

What’s your problem with it?

Don’t be sorry, it’s the best news I’ve heard all decade!

The maddening thing is that you know the economic consequences would be easier to deal with a bit of solidarity, but we’re not going to.

Call me when the global birth rate is falling. Until then it’s a local problem.

And when the global birth rate is flattening I will throw a fucking party because we can finally start thinking about global sustainability.

There are lots of hard working bright people that are literally dying to come work and live in your country. This is not a population problem. It’s a racism problem.

deleted by creator

Way to show you are committed to the international rules based order, mister Secretary.

Cool. Do openshift and keycloak next!