![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://feddit.uk/pictrs/image/402440a2-c9ee-4373-8c98-d55bda8ee4fa.png)
Do you care that the DUP has seats?
No, reform will be equally meaningless.
Do you care that the DUP has seats?
No, reform will be equally meaningless.
There’s a reason I put the word “elective” in my post. Your hypothetical is not an elective situation. It’s an emergency procedure and so would not be covered by the legislation.
Increasing taxes is just taking a larger and larger slice of a shrinking pie. You have to make the pie bigger. We have to grow.
Austerity hurt us. Brexit hurt us. We need to repair those things and accelerate growth.
What a weird article. It talks as if abortion is illegal in the UK. It is not illegal.
I think it’s talking about at what point in the pregnancy abortion is allowed. I think most would agree that there is a point at which elective abortion should be off the table (e.g. would anybody argue for an abortion to be allowed the day before birth?). So the debate is about when that point is. A fair debate, but articles like this don’t help.
I want this so bad. Please please please.
No,no! I mustn’t hope. Hope is the bringer of disappointment.
Trouble is that people pointing at this as evidence to show that Reform can’t be given power fail to realise that it doesn’t play as a negative to those that vote for them. Some Reform voters see this and think “they’re not afraid to be honest”. Trump’s comment played positively to a large number, as awful as that is.
Digging up a little bit of misogyny on these people isn’t worth the effort.
Russia is the remains of an empire whose head is longing after past glories. It’s all about Putin’s ego and not accepting Russia’s role in the world of today.
Ironic that the party that’s being going on about proportional representation for 40 years or more is playing the FPTP game so well.
He doesn’t need more victim cards to play.
In the US all of that was enabled because they got their useful idiots in power. We’re throwing them out. I don’t see the similarity.
…because they have been the party of power.
People don’t pay money to parties that don’t have any way on delivering. If the come back with sub-100 seats, their doners will be looking for more effective ways to spend their money.
Do you think a style guide is enough for an open source code base? Contributions could be coming from lots of directions, and the code review process to enforce a style guide is going to be a lot of work. Even rejecting something takes time.
Never heard of them. If it’s intentional I think that would be lost on the vast majority of people.
The feeling I’m getting is that Tories will mostly be staying at home on polling day, and I don’t think that’s going to be a wipeout in the long term. I don’t think the bar will have to be very high for them to return next time.
What this election is very likely to do is wipeout their ability to raise money, and that’s the big long term danger for them.
Furthermore there are many changes to NumPy internals, including continuing to migrate code from C to C++, that will make it easier to improve and maintain NumPy in the future.
I realise that C can be rather low level a lot of the time, but I’m not sure I’d pick C++ to help keep things easy to maintain. It opens up a Pandora’s box of possibilities.
Well, welcome.
Tell me it’s your first Westminster election without telling me.
Where are the Tarquin Fin-tim-lin-bin-whin-bim-lim-bus-stop-F’tang-F’tang-Olé-Biscuitbarrels of today?
Murdered by the returning officer?
131 is too many.