One of the most aggravating things to me in this world has to be the absolutely rampant anti-intellectualism that dominates so many conversations and debates, and its influence just seems to be expanding. Do you think there will ever actually be a time when this ends? I'd hope so once people become more educated and cultural changes eventually happen, but as of now it honestly infuriates me like few things ever have.

  • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure that your statement has anything to do with stopping thinking of others as dummies. I think it’s telling you to think of them that way, and you’re just trying to push that under the rug to try to be nice.

    You’re saying to understand anti intellectualism you need to understand things from their perspective.

    The lack of knowledge (especially true knowledge) and lesser ability to understand complex ideas are major aspects of that perspective.

    No matter how we define or measure intelligence, we’re mathematically guaranteed that it’s distributed approximately on a bell curve with a small number of intelligent people at the top.

    • ThePenitentOne@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll never not see anti-intellectual people as stupid, even if they have their reasons. I used to be an idiot who actively did things they thought were wrong. But eventually I stopped because I realised it’s completely hypocritical and morally and logically wrong. I came to that conclusion without need of others judging me through my own self-reflection, and I’ll admit it was hard. Even so, I wished somebody would have called me out, but I guess animal consumption is so engrained in society people don’t even question it. I had my reasons to do so, but they were by no means a justification. I still try to understand things in different ways, but eventually it becomes redundant taking each case and doing so. The reality is that anti-intellectualism is incredibly prevalent and people need to change their ways of thinking. Sometimes they are just blatantly wrong and need to stop letting their emotions do their thinking. Sometimes there is nothing to understand. I don’t know why people are so bent on seeing every individual separately, it’s impossible to do so. Even if we do, they are still liable for their actions. Such as choosing not to self-reflect.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The reality is that … people need to change their thinking

        Sounds like your grasp of what “reality” refers to is flawed. What kind of instrument would one use to measure whether people need to change their thinking? What units does that instrument use?

        Maybe instead of bemoaning how little effort others are putting into understanding things, you should forge ahead with your own work.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The lack of knowledge (especially true knowledge) and lesser ability to understand complex ideas are major aspects of that perspective.

      Can you prove this?

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The mark of an intellectual! Making bold statements without evidence then suppressing any discussion of that lack of evidence.

        Gee I wonder why anti-intellectualism exists?

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It couldn’t possibly be because of dumbshits like you who enable them, thinking that by allowing them to dominate the conversation every single time it is brought up that you’ll convince them to see the light or anything.

          It couldn’t possibly be people like you pushing popular misconceptions about the debate and blindly accepting every dumb personal attack they make on the rest of us as true without critically thinking about any of it or applying any of your intelligence or anything.

          Nah. The problem is other people who call them out and hold them accountable. Totally everyone else.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah you basically claimed that anti-intellectualism is based on stupidity. Do you have any evidence of that?

            The answer is obviously no, or you’d be producing it

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago
              1. Anti-intellectualism is stupidity. All stupidity is is just willful ignorance. That’s what the word means colloquially and we’re using the colloquial meaning of the term.

              2. Grow the fuck up and stop defending stupid people. You are literally harming our country by legitimizing them and anti-intellectualism as a whole. That kind of thinking has no place in any modern society and neither do you if you think that’s the direction we should allow it to be dragged in.

              • quinnly@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                That kind of thinking has no place in any modern society and neither do you

                Psssssst saying stuff like that doesn’t make you sound very smart

                • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t give a fuck how I sound. Personally attacking me doesn’t work. All you anti-intellectualist dipshits have to bring to the table are dumb personal attacks, red herrings, and temper tantrums whenever you’re told you need to know basic facts, and understand things you clearly don’t, and the rest of us are sick of it.

                  Be a fucking adult for once in your lives.

                  • quinnly@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I don’t give a fuck how I sound

                    Well you had me fooled, given that you seem to think what you’re saying is so important

                    Be a fucking adult

                    I wanna dig into this, please elaborate on your adult ideal

                  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    All you anti-intellectual dipshits have to bring to the table are dumb personal attacks …

                    Wow I didn’t even need to quote two sentences of yours to expose your hypocrisy. You managed to do it in the span of ten words.

                    But just to drive the point home, this was you a couple comments ago:

                    Grow the fuck up and stop defending stupid people. You are literally harming our country by legitimizing them and anti-intellectualism as a whole. That kind of thinking has no place in any modern society and neither do you

                    Like, you’re spewing vitriol. Do you really not see that?

              • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Anti-intellectualism is stupidity

                No. You have your definitions arranged sloppily. Stupidity is stupidity.

                Grow the fuck up and stop defending stupid people.

                I’m not defending anyone. Like at all. You being unable to see that is another indicator of how sloppy and undisciplined your mind is.

                Colloquially, anti-intellectualism is the stance that intellectualism is bad. Intellectualism is not the same as intelligence. Intellectualism is a specific relationship with the mind and knowledge. Specifically it’s the belief that articulated argument and logic is the best way to approach knowledge. Anti-intellectualism is the stance that there are other ways far more valuable to develop knowledge.

                For a bunch of self-proclaimed “intellectuals” you guys have no idea what you’re talking about.

                Like being an intellectual and in favor of intellectualism is one thing. It’s another thing entirely to declare yourself an intellectual without actually being one.

                In my experience, skilled intellectuals don’t call themselves that, and people who call themselves intellectuals are primarily interested in being seen as special.

                Just to educate you a little on what the landscape is here, alternatives to intellectual consideration of reality include:

                • intuition
                • phenomenology
                • practice
                • empiricism
                • idiocy

                You’ve latched onto one of those, because apparently you don’t read enough to have any awareness whatsoever of the context of this conversation. Which is ahem rather anti-intellectual of you.