• very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    My dude, your argument boils down to “this is the way we’ve always done it so this is the way it must be”.

    But we haven’t done this always. As humans we have tried different attempts. Socialism, communism, monarchy, feudalism, democracy, capitalism, social capitalism, anarchism,…

    And here we are now. After all those experiments.

    Have you considered the possibility that if innovation were to slow, and companies DIDN’T insist on quarter-after-quarter growth, the world might just continue to turn?

    But we humans are not made to chill. We need to advance as fast as possible. My parents and their generation did so. We now have AI becoming increasingly popular. And sooner or later I will hopefully have children. So I have to do my part, that the lives my kin will be better than mine. Better medical tech, better education, better transport, better tech,… Of course the world would continue to turn.

    That while the richest individuals may be slightly less rich, the vast majority of people would continue their lives with no negative consequences?

    I don’t understand why you always believe that if the rich were less rich, that anything would change. It would not.

    • Void_Reader@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you considered that this too might be an ‘experiment’?

      Defenders of monarchy and the divine right of kings used to argue the exact same thing - that we tried democracy before and it failed in the Roman Republic and Ancient Greece - so clearly feudal monarchy is the best, right?

      Yet here we are, experimenting again.

      Why is this joke of a system the ideal? It doesn’t produce innovation - most of the stuff that led to the internet and modern computing came out of DARPA and various govt funded universities. All of our space advancements were from state-run NASA and the Soviet space programme. The wealthy CEO types only start ‘innovating’ after taxpayers fund most of the R&D. Same with medical advancements, material science, physics - almost every single positive innovation has come from state-run, taxpayer-funded, or non-profit institutions.

      Maybe try reading a little bit more about all this innovation you seem so fond of:

      https://academic.oup.com/ser/article/7/3/459/1693191

      https://demos.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/Entrepreneurial_State_-_web.pdf

      https://yewtu.be/watch?v=oLLxpAZzy0s

      • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you considered that this too might be an ‘experiment’?

        Yes. It very well might be. But todays world is so strongly interwoven. Tons of conflicts are constantly challenging the system. And it has yet to break. The final test will be the sudden termination of economic growth. This will be the point, where it will be shows how resilient capitalism rly is.

        Defenders of monarchy and the divine right of kings used to argue the exact same thing - that we tried democracy before and it failed in the Roman Republic and Ancient Greece - so clearly feudal monarchy is the best, right?

        Tell me which system to try next. But pls don’t suggest to repeat another one again.

        Yet here we are, experimenting again.

        And that’s a good thing.

        Why is this joke of a system the ideal? It doesn’t produce innovation - most of the stuff that led to the internet and modern computing came out of DARPA and various govt funded universities.

        That was maybe the start. But big companies managed to elevate the importance to another level. The complexity of everything was reinforced and elevated drastically, driven by private companies. Just take a look at AI at this point. AI is innovation, mainly driven by private companies.

        All of our space advancements were from state-run NASA and the Soviet space programme.

        Because most of it was useless. What kind of innovation did. space exploration bring to humans?

        The wealthy CEO types only start ‘innovating’ after taxpayers fund most of the R&D.

        As I already stated, this is not the case. Especially pharma, medical and IT is heavily driven by big corporations. Basic research on the other hand, there you are right. As it usually does not feature real world appliances, means that it’s mostly founded by tax payers and the government.

        Same with medical advancements,

        Especially medical innovation is heavily driven from the private sector. Pharmaceuticals as well. There is not much involvement of any government or tax payer.

        material science, physics - almost every single positive innovation has come from state-run, taxpayer-funded, or non-profit institutions.

        But as I said, mostly for the basic research. Without much interest in application.

        Maybe try reading a little bit more about all this innovation you seem so fond of: https://academic.oup.com/ser/article/7/3/459/1693191 https://demos.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/Entrepreneurial_State_-_web.pdf https://yewtu.be/watch?v=oLLxpAZzy0s

        I have a good understanding of sciences. Especially in chemistry and physics. Thanks.

        • Void_Reader@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          None of those links are about Chemistry or Physics. The demos link is Economics, The Entrepreneurial State. The youtube link is about the history of the internet. Maybe try learning something that isn’t STEM. Might broaden your way of thinking.

          I’ll respond to the rest of your comment later, although I’m not sure I want to anymore since you clearly have no interest in taking into account new information.

          Also how the fuck can you be interested in technology and say something like this:

          Because most of it was useless. What kind of innovation did. space exploration bring to humans?

          If you know anything about any science you should know how stupid of a point this is

          • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            None of those links are about Chemistry or Physics. The demos link is Economics, The Entrepreneurial State. The youtube link is about the history of the internet. Maybe try learning something that isn’t STEM. Might broaden your way of thinking.

            Sure it would. But it probably wouldn’t change my standpoint.

            I’ll respond to the rest of your comment later, although I’m not sure I want to anymore since you clearly have no interest in taking into account new information.

            Yes, unfortunately I am extremely stubborn. Sorry.

            Also how the fuck can you be interested in technology and say something like this:

            Because most of it was useless. What kind of innovation did. space exploration bring to humans?

            Because rockets are boring. Bubble and stuff is just extraordinary craftsmanship and black matter will take some time. And I overall hate relativity theory. I am hoping for gravitons. Wave functions rock.

            If you know anything about any science you should know how stupid of a point this is

            Not stupid. Some sciences simply are idiotic. Do you have any idea how much I hate biologists. Entitled brats. Some of them have an extreme superiority complex. And don’t get my talking about physicists. Buch of weirdos. You should see physicists interact with biologists. It like two different species encountering each other. But communication attempts are futile.

            • Void_Reader@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, unfortunately I am extremely stubborn. Sorry.

              Fair, you do you mate

              Because rockets are boring. Bubble and stuff is just extraordinary craftsmanship and black matter will take some time. And I overall hate relativity theory. I am hoping for gravitons. Wave functions rock.

              Well, have fun with that, I will stop arguing.

              Not stupid. Some sciences simply are idiotic. Do you have any idea how much I hate biologists. Entitled brats. Some of them have an extreme superiority complex. And don’t get my talking about physicists. Buch of weirdos. You should see physicists interact with biologists. It like two different species encountering each other. But communication attempts are futile.

              llmaooo you should do science-themed standup

              I only know three biologists and they are lovely people. Never seen them interact with physicists though so you may be right.

    • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And sooner or later I will hopefully have children.

      And when the average summer day is 60c and crops fail every single year, and Nestle has taken half our drinking water, and the smoke in the air from wildfires is giving everyone asthma, and deadly storms happen year round, and the coasts erode, and wars break out for the remaining water/etc, what will you tell them? Will you tell them to look at the brilliant ‘innovator’ CEO’s who intentionally shut down electric cars? The CEO’s who found out climate change was happening sixty years ago and intentionally hid it to keep themselves rich, what do you tell your kids about that?

      What innovation is worth your children dying early?

      • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t believe that those scenarios are that plausible.

        Here is south Germany, the climate change has led to mediterran plants growing here. The plant life for the climate already exist. And they are spreading (olives don’t make it through the winter yet).

        Change is happening, but adapting to it is possible. And solutions for adaptation do not have to be invented, because they already exist.

        • xts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t believe that those scenarios are that plausible.

          lol i think they said the same thing about the Titanic sinking. also the submarine guy said the same thing about it imploding.

          Hmm 🤔

          also all evidence that’s not conservative propaganda points to us hitting the worst possible outcomes when it comes to climate change. Read the IPCC reports and the worst case scenarios listed within. That’s what’s going to happen over the next ~40 years

          • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have been reading about the worst case scenario. But even then the oceans would heat up, Oxygen saturation would diminish, big fish would die, algae would thrive on higher CO2 levels and buffer climate change at some point. Humanity and most animals on land should be capable to survive to this buffer point.

    • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      You know, as a member of the SSBN force, occasionally during thermonuclear launch exercises I take a moment to regret the death of humanity and the biosphere. People like you, on the other hand, are what steels my resolve to flip the switch with gusto. I hope you know that I’ll be thinking of you, should I receive the order to commence procedures to launch.

      • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You sound like a fragile personality. You might be in the wrong occupation.

        Or you might be talking bullshit. Because I doubt that you would have internet on a submarine.

        • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Shipmate, I am a Navigation Electronic Technician First Class Petty Officer, fully qualified in both submarines and in my rating. I have been on five strategic alert deterrent patrols over the last three years. I’ve been through fires, flooding, and steam line ruptures. When we set condition 1SQ for Strategic Launch during WSRT, I was the one at the consoles conducting the procedures to do so. I’ve been a helmsman, planesman, Strategic Navigation Technician, and Quartermaster of the Watch.

          Of course I wouldn’t have internet while submerged or at sea. Have you ever heard of in-port periods?

          Fragile personality or not, I’m the sailor at the switch. What have you done with your life, shipmate?

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t let the troll get to you… I’ve had someone on here a week or so ago tell me I was lying about my expertise. It’s almost like they’re all taking lessons from the same people.

            • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Thanks. And yeah, they’re probably just trying the tried and true War Thunder and Discord method. Or they’re not taking lessons from the same people, they are the same people. Who knows?

          • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I still think you are lying. Or you are incredibly stupid. Because your identity and your job should be kept secret. My grandparents were military engineers in the Soviet Union. Do you think anyone knew that? Of course not, because they were instructed to not talk about it. As should you, in case you are the real deal. I myself have followed the path of my father, currently studying to become a chemist in Munich. One ore year to go.

            • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And for the record, best of luck in your studies. I hold no personal animosity, and a great deal of professional respect, for my counterparts in other militaries. We all have a job to do. If that means one of us has to shoot torpedoes at the other, we’ll cross that bridge when the time comes. I do think, however, that you should never underestimate the willingness of the US to go to great lengths to do what it thinks is necessary.

              • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                And for the record, best of luck in your studies. I hold no personal animosity, and a great deal of professional respect, for my counterparts in other militaries.

                I do not hold any grudge towards you as well.

                We all have a job to do. If that means one of us has to shoot torpedoes at the other, we’ll cross that bridge when the time comes. I do think, however, that you should never underestimate the willingness of the US to go to great lengths to do what it thinks is necessary.

                Wars are fought in many levels. And the Ukraine war has already been lost. A financial Desaster to the west. No military power will change that.

                Current surveys indicate republicans to be in power next year. And in Europe we also see a shifting in opinion in Schweden, France and Germany towards parties that roan further right and are against weapon deliveries into Ukraine. Quite contrary, they are pro Russia in many ways.

                And I don’t judge. But if this development further continues, then all the money wasted on military support is gone. And Russia wins. In a world filled with intercontinental missiles, a war is won politically and economically.

                So no matter how wiling and ready the US is, military power cannot rival with economical and political strategies.

                • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Financial? Perhaps. Demographically, however, I believe Russia and Europe have entered a terminal demographic decline, only accelerated in Russia’s case by the war. America, on the other hand, has not lost any soldiers or any significant resources and has increased the industrial capacity of the military-industrial complex. Strategically, from a cold, hard, pragmatic point of view, that counts as a win for my superiors, in the long term. Financial ups and downs are temporary and manageable. Demographic collapses are not.

                  • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Financial? Perhaps. Demographically, however, I believe Russia and Europe have entered a terminal demographic decline, only accelerated in Russia’s case by the war.

                    Due to immense migration, demographic change is a thing of the past now. France, Germany and other western European countries no longer face this problem. On the other side it comes with new problems, as failed integration has become a huge problem.

                    And considering Russia, the country has one big ass infantry. And in the Ukraine war, Russia has yet to call for total mobilisation. And the west, even with the help of the US did not yet manage to deliver enough ammunition and weaponry to push back the Russian forces. For me that’s an indicator that Russia is more capable of actual war than the West.

                    Especially the US had many military missions in the past decades and most of them failed. Afghanistan is just one of the many failed attempts of military control. The US military has shown not to be capable to win wars, but only maintain them.

                    America, on the other hand, has not lost any soldiers or any significant resources and has increased the industrial capacity of the military-industrial complex.

                    Well and so did the Russians. The west has more specialised and modern weapons, it these have now proven to be too complicate to be produced in sufficient masses. Russia using old tech with easier produced weaponry has shown to be much more resilient than expected. Making use of the oldschool Propeller for bombs instead of high tech laser measured ignition timers, has proven to be just as effective. The US military has been scammed in many ways by weapon manufacturers into buying over complicated tech for simple applications.

                    Strategically, from a cold, hard, pragmatic point of view, that counts as a win for my superiors, in the long term.

                    If your superiors were involved in the last decades military operations of the US, then their word shouldn’t be taken too serious. Afghanistan is just the latest failure of along series of failures. And currently it seems, like the US will fail in Ukraine as well, even before sending troops.

                    Financial ups and downs are temporary and manageable.

                    Financial ups and downs can cripple a country’s economy so immensely, that they change a country’s direction for years later.

                    There is no military without tax payers. And in a broken economy, there are not many willing tax payers.

                    Demographic collapses are not.

                    It can be corrected with migration, even though migration poses its own new problems.

            • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Shipmate, if you look in my post history I literally did an AMA about my profession about a month ago, and a Machinists Mate Chief even jumped in to contribute. I haven’t disclosed any ships movement, naval nuclear propulsion information or even controlled unclassified information. I keep my personal electronic devices physically far, far away from any work device, and we never cross the streams, as the saying goes.

              • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s still something that I wouldn’t tell people on the internet.

                Especially if you have family. The Chinese, the Russians, the Israelis,… you just elevated the chances that they know about you. And now they also know that you are the sharing kind. A little bit bragging.

                Don’t make yourself a target. Not the smartest thing to do.

                • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Sister’s in the marine corps and so is her husband. They can take care of themselves.

                  I’ll take your advice into consideration. Still, you have again reminded me why I don’t feel the burden of my duty too much. The existence of such organizations only hardens my resolve to flip the switch when the time comes.

                  • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Sister’s in the marine corps and so is her husband. They can take care of themselves.

                    Against Russian agents with Nowitschock or North Koreans using poison as well? I doubt that.

                    I’ll take your advice into consideration. Still, you have again reminded me why I don’t feel the burden of my duty too much. The existence of such organizations only hardens my resolve to flip the switch when the time comes.

                    You are a troll. Cannot take you and your persona serious anymore. There is not a single soldier this irrational on this world.