• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the company is operating in good faith, they will be making “reasonable accommodations” for disabled workers.

    The top tier of this program requires about 30 minutes of running per day. I’m sure we can find a similarly intensive workout to meet the needs and capabilities of disabled workers, numbnuts.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the company is operating in good faith,

      If they’re going on with this idea, they’re definitely not operating in good faith.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nothing in the article even suggests they are operating in bad faith.

        The company is basically asking them to voluntarily extend their work day by 15 to 30 minutes, but instead of offering time-and-a-half they would be entitled to as “overtime”, they will double, or more than double their wages.

        That roughly 30 minute period of activity is worth about 16 times their hourly pay.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The year end bonus was canceled in order to enforce this “healthy” change during the coming months. The workers lost something they were supposed to get because some asshole wanted them to be “healthier”. There’s a considerable chance that the company will distribute less money to the workers that way.

          It’s not about keeping workers healthy, it’s about saving money, that’s bad faith.