• BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    il y a 11 mois

    Plus many of them are so poorly maintained they likely wouldn’t launch anyway. Missiles have a lot of upkeep

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      il y a 11 mois

      While this may well be true, Russia has so many nukes and nukes are themselves so destructive that it’s kinda cold comfort even if 90% of them fail

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          il y a 11 mois

          You wouldn’t even need a working one. A lot of nuclear responses work by going off the moment a likely missile fitting that criteria launches, since it would be too late otherwise.

          Someone making the wrong decision at a given time could easily cause everything to go up in a nuclear conflagration. It’s nearly happened before.

    • Forester@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      il y a 11 mois

      Comrade what do with many ICBM no longer function?

      I have a best solution we take derelict submarine insert many warhead call it Poseidon. Is glorious Soviet superweapon Dah.