physfluids.fr
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year ago

dotnet developer

programming.dev

message-square
59
fedilink
42

dotnet developer

programming.dev

JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year ago
message-square
59
fedilink
  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    some legacy software checked if the OS name began with “Windows 9” to differentiate between 95 and future versions.

    This is a myth. Windows doesn’t even have an API to give you the marketing name of the OS. Internally, Windows 95 is version 4.0 and Windows 98 is 4.1. The API to get the version returns the major and minor version separately, so to check for Windows 95 you’d check if majorVersion = 4 and minorVersion = 0.

    Edit: This is the return type from the API: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winnt/ns-winnt-osversioninfoexa

    • Trailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe it’s a myth, but it sure sounds plausible. The software that checks the “Windows 9” substring doesn’t even have to exist for this to be reason they chose to skip to version 10 — they just had to be concerned that it might exist.

      Sure, maybe there’s no C function that returns the string, but there’s a ver command. It would be trivial to shell out to the command. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ver_(command)

      This doesn’t prove anything, but there are a TON of examples of code that checks for the substring. It’s not hard to imagine that code written circa 2000 would not be future proof. https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=context:global+“\“windows+9\””&patternType=keyword&sm=0

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        but there are a TON of examples of code that checks for the substring

        oh

        oh no

        There’s code in the JDK that does that??

        I really wish I didn’t see that.

        • Trailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup!! Never look under the hood in software, you’ll just be disappointed ☹️

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve been a software developer for 20 years and this comment is too real. Some days I’m amazed that any software even works at all.

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Having worked in both food service and software, I encourage you not to visit the kitchen of any restaurants you enjoy either.

Programmer Humor@programming.dev

programmer_humor@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !programmer_humor@programming.dev

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

  • Keep content in english
  • No advertisements
  • Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.33K users / day
  • 4.78K users / week
  • 9.36K users / month
  • 17.8K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 23.1K subscribers
  • 1.15K Posts
  • 32.8K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Feyter@programming.dev
  • adr1an@programming.dev
  • BurningTurtle@programming.dev
  • Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev
  • BE: 0.19.4
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org