• Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And what gives you the right to determine what “properly monitored and implemented referendums” are?

    Also Russia is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie just the same as the US so that argument holds zero water here.

    I am genuinely curious what your metrics for what constitutes a legitimate referendum are.

    • Lmaydev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nothing to do with me. I’m a programmer lol

      Nothing to do with the US. I wouldn’t support them invading a neighbor after a bogus vote they arranged. Whataboutism.

      Independent monitors to make sure the vote is fair.

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The pure (libertarian) socialists’ ideological anticipations remain untainted by existing practice. They do not explain how the manifold functions of a revolutionary society would be organized, how external attack and internal sabotage would be thwarted, how bureaucracy would be avoided, scarce resources allocated, policy differences settled, priorities set, and production and distribution conducted. Instead, they offer vague statements about how the workers themselves will directly own and control the means of production and will arrive at their own solutions through creative struggle. No surprise then that the pure socialists support every revolution except the ones that succeed.

          –Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds

          This is more of a comment on radlibs and baby anarchists, but it strikes me as appropriate here. It’s very easy to idealistically criticize everything that isn’t the way it should be. At some point, though, you have to address reality.