• booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I say that, I’m going by every regular source that ever existed

    “regular source” citations-needed

    its near-impossible standards for leaving or entering

    did you know these are imposed on them externally? their policy is that they love tourists. here’s a video of a couple of australian tourists enjoying themselves there. the reason americans can’t go there is because the US forbids it.

    its lack of internet access (who here has seen anyone who is actually from North Korea),

    it’s a country under brutal siege for its entire history. yes, they’re poor. whose fault is that?

    • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Regular sources as in MSNBC, CNN, NPR, Wikipedia, etc. sources that are the most established, enough that they’re among the top 500 websites and that they show up on the first page of a Google search. Not to mention a random source is going to have random origins, trust in a source has to be earned and even with trusted sources you must compare and contrast them sometimes.

      The restrictions for leaving and entering have not been imposed on them externally, this attitude of Korea predates even the Roman empire so external factors wouldn’t have been possible as a cause, even though it’s undeniable there are nations that have restricted anyone from going there. Japan used to be the same way at different points in history, though for the time being they’re open to everyone.

      • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        sources
        Wikipedia

        michael-laugh

        The restrictions for leaving and entering have not been imposed on them externally, this attitude of Korea predates even the Roman empire so external factors wouldn’t have been possible as a cause

        jesse-wtf

        come back when you can form a coherent thought

        • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In what way is it not coherent? Am I supposed to communicate almost wholly in pictures like you’re doing instead of links (it should be noted your pictures appear as transparent blocks either due to the defederstion settings or a glitch thereof).

          Apologies if my semantics/grammar are too loose, as English is not my first language (it’s always hard translating Asiatic languages into English), though an online grammar checker said it was fine.

          • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            we are having a conversation about a country which has existed for less than 100 years why the fuck are you talking about the roman empire and the joseon dynasty

            Apologies if my semantics/grammar are too loose

            your grammar is fine, it is the content of your posts which is utterly useless.

            • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It has existed at various times throughout history in different forms and even aspects of the state ideology such as Cheondoism are simply modern manifestations of ancient tradition. There is nothing new about it or its cultural attitudes, not if you ask the Chinese and not if you ask the later Christian missionaries who attempted to do anything there only to be punished for existence.

              • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                you have some very strange, very incorrect ideas about the DPRK built on a foundation of circular logic. please start de-propagandizing yourself with that video i linked earlier, it’s a very good one.

                • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Based on a video of yours (which I did watch) or based on all the sources I gave (which are plenty and back my “foundation of circular logic”)?

                  • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You linked two things. One of these is an article about literal ancient history, and the other is an article about three Christians who all lived and died long before the country we’re discussing existed. Please, please explain to me how your “sources” are in any way relevant to the topic at hand.

                    Your circular logic is as follows: The DPRK is isolationist. We know it’s isolationist because they don’t let people in. We know they don’t let people in because they’re isolationist. No, I won’t pay any attention to the hard fact that they do, in fact, let people in, and that it is in fact their enemies who do not let people into their country.