Can you summarize their reaction to BG3? You got me intrigued.
Can you summarize their reaction to BG3? You got me intrigued.
Judging by what OP was searching for, they’re probably aware. And the scammers are too.
GDPR doesn’t require them to ask if they would just not violate our privacy. In other words, it’s perfectly legal to assume “no” if they have no means of asking.
I swear, soon the terms “fediverse” and “federated” will get muddled up like when people have been saying “open source” when they mean “free (as in free beer)”.
So first you claim it’s all lies and didn’t happen, only to follow with “This was only one incident, and hopefully it won’t be repeated elsewhere”? Which one is it then?
Either FR or PFP. “FR” just feels like another filler word. PFP… I’m too used to calling them “avatars”, it just feels wrong and superfluous. I’m probably aging myself here.
A computer preinstalled with Linux is definitely more likely to confuse than you imagine
I can only see it being the case if there is an implicit assumption these people are already familiar with Windows. If we remove that assumption, I can see it going either way, but it’s not even remotely “definitely more likely to confuse”.
Yes, linking the religious leadership of the inherently strongly hierarchical belief systems with these belief systems sounds very reasonable to me.
I have an impression we agree on the reasoning, just not on the details and the conclusions from these details. At this point we’re arguing the semantics of whether the religious people rejecting their religious leadership still belong to the same religion or rather they invented their own religion distinct from the original one. In other words, whether the leadership is an inherent part of their religion.
Do I have that right that apart from the above we’re pretty much on the same page?
That would be ideal, agreed. I’m not singling out Islam here.
If she still considered herself a Muslim, then what happened to her was perfectly in line with her claimed worldview. She can only ever see herself as a victim by rejecting her religion. She probably wasn’t conscious of it but at this point I’d say she was already an ex-muslim, it’s a matter of a therapist making her aware of it (assuming she’d be rescued in time!).
So ex-muslims? Nothing against them as far as I’m concerned.
Whether it was a successful coup is a separate matter.
Back in my day we called them avatars, youngster!
“Yes” in this case is agreeing with the cause of this list.
I mean, what do you expect from Fedipact? The dev doesn’t push anything onto you, you willingly visit a list that got created for the very purpose of going against Threads. There is no hidden agenda.
That would imply nuking people is “a Jewish thing”. Do we really want to go there?
I’m pretty sure the same operation without Git (or another VCS) would be infinitely more troublesome, not less.
Not for the abusers. They’d rather shape your experience and groom you into a perfect abuse victim.
All kinds of Indian curry. I cannot get enough of it.
If you’re okay with paying for it, Kagi is great and respects the user privacy.