Also punched cards had around 80 columns, which put a hard limit on the number of characters per line.
Moderates @fluidmechanics@discuss.tchncs.de
Also punched cards had around 80 columns, which put a hard limit on the number of characters per line.
The follow up question would be the opposing force which keeps them in orbit(als)? This balance of force was called the planetary model which has this shortcoming that electrons might fall into the nucleus.
If electrons actually followed such a trajectory, all atoms would act is miniature broadcasting stations. Moreover, the radiated energy would come from the kinetic energy of the orbiting electron; as this energy gets radiated away, there is less centrifugal force to oppose the attractive force due to the nucleus. The electron would quickly fall into the nucleus, following a trajectory that became known as the “death spiral of the electron”. According to classical physics, no atom based on this model could exist for more than a brief fraction of a second.
I am trying to recall what kind of forces enable the orbitals of electrons according to Quantum Mechanics.
Strange argument… how does that prevent checks versus Windows 7, 8 and 1* all of which would be less than 9.
And I don’t like how sparse the data points are but they went with a wobbly interpolated curve anyway.
This is amazing. I never knew that Egyptian hieroglyphs had names for kingdoms in the Indian subcontinent.
The theme is FAIR and open-science and more specifically Research Software management.
Eww de Elon
Good point, and Łukasz Langa mentioned this in his talk (check it out). He names it the robustness principle, in his words (around 22:20
mark:
“Vague in what you accept, concrete in what you return”
But he also mentions some gotchas like how Iterable[str]
can backfire, because str
is also an Iterable[str]
and it might be better to use list[str]
.
I wouldn’t say that he is the leading authority, but he is a well known researcher in atmospheric and ocean sciences. His book is the go to book for graduate studies in the subject, so he is well versed in the topic.
An endorsement from Geoff Vallis? This might be interesting.
It is important to recall of IPCC’s mission to be “policy neutral while being policy relevant and never policy prescriptive”. They try their best to be scientifically accurate, discuss the state and suggest solutions. One can wonder why IPCC won’t take sides and but that’s the way it has always been. The burden of what to do with their message is always upon the commons.
This statement is on a similar vein. While it was possibly guided at consoling common people from climate grief, it has all the risks of being misquoted.
It is a relief that there are no continental drift deniers.