Damn I love the ai summarize function, but again a tldr:
The article compares 27 humanoid robots with humans to see who is superior in terms of sensory-motor abilities. It finds that individual components of robots, such as cameras, microphones, and carbon fibers, are better than human organs and tissues. However, when it comes to performing tasks in human environments, such as walking, climbing stairs, or picking up objects, humans are still more capable and versatile than robots. The article suggests that the main challenge for robot-makers is to integrate the components into a coherent system that can learn and adapt to different situations. The article also discusses the ethical and social implications of humanoid robots, such as their impact on human dignity, identity, and employment
integrate the components into a coherent system
Always has been and still is the holy grail of general purpose artificial intelligence.
This study is dumb. They disqualified all the robots which had a physical advantage over humans… obviously that gives humans an advantage.
