• Elise@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel out of the loop here. What’s so secretive about a photo of a newborn?

    • JCreazy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 months ago

      Some people just don’t want pictures of their kids all on the internet. It could be seen as borderline paranoia by some people but I think everyone has the right to the level of privacy that they want.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The best form of taking secure photos of your family is to take photos with a dedicated camera with it’s own memory card. Develop the photo into a hard copy and keep the image digitally stored in your own systems and never share it online.

    • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Also CSAM detection algorithms are known to misfire on occasion (it’s hard to impossible to tell apart a picture of a naked child sent for porn purposes and one not send for that) and people want to avoid any false allegations of that if at all possible.

    • grandel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because the child might not want pictures of themselves on the internet. Its a right to privacy thing, at least here in the EU.

    • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, babies are cute and all, but they all look the same for the first few weeks. If Everyone just had a standard library of like 20 or so pictures of newborn babies and everyone just picked one and shaired it instead of pictures of their kid no one would notice.