So I just discovered that I have been working next to the waste of oxygen that raped my best friend several years ago. I work in a manufacturing environment and I know that you can’t fire someone just for being a sex offender unless it directly interferes with work duties (in the US). But despite it being a primarily male workforce he does work with several women who have no idea what he is. He literally followed a woman home, broke into her house, and raped her. Him working here puts every female employee at risk. How is that not an unsafe working environment? How is it at even legal to employ him anywhere where he will have contact with women?

  • kirklennon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I know that you can’t fire someone just for being a sex offender unless it directly interferes with work duties (in the US)

    You can definitely fire someone for being a sex offender in the US. Outside of a few exceptions that probably don’t apply in your case, you can also fire someone for being merely an accused sex offender.

    You can also fire someone for laughing in a weird way, or wearing a color you don’t like, or being born on a Monday when you don’t like Mondays.

    • metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      people don’t think it be like it is but it do.

      anti-discrimination laws just mean employers can’t give the real reason so they’ve gotten really good at making up legally acceptable reasons.

        • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          “Right to work” means employees can work in a union shop and receive the benefits of such without having to join the union or pay dues. It’s a set of laws that have successfully destroyed unions.

          You’re thinking of “at will” employment laws, which means an employer can fire an employee for any reason or for no reason, but not for an illegal reason (which varies depending on state but includes the right to organize and rights against discrimination and retaliation).

        • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re thinking of at-will employment states. Right to work is about joining unions and making that difficult.

    • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Many US based companies also do pre-employment background checks. So either OP works for a company that doesn’t or they work for a “second chance” company that is OK with violent backgrounds. Either way the company is fine with his background and is very unlikely to fire him for something they likely knew about at hire.