• Bonehead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The rockets are fine. SpaceX has a team specifically designed to distract Musk and keep him away from the actual work on the rockets. Tesla didn’t have that though. That’s how we ended up with that lame presentation with the weird “S3XY” acromin. That was really the point I realized that he was just an idiot frat boy with too much money. He really is his own worst enemy.

      • Pringles@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s your source on the spacex team distracting him? I can’t find anything supporting that. I do find some interviews from anonymous employees saying it’s calmer now that he’s so focused on twitter.

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        the thing about spacex is everything they do is because of nasa and government.

        the only thing spacex has going for it is the fact that they can spend a billion dollars exploding a rocket five times before it slightly works the sixth whereas the government can’t do that.

        • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As someone who does know about this field, and absolute despise Musk, that’s not quite true. SpaceX is very successful thanks to help from the US government, and despite the influence of Musk, but also because they are a team of very competent people who have actually innovated and pushed the boundaries of launch vehicles. To say they have nothing going for them and are being propped up by the government is not at all accurate, and they have been much more succesful than traditional government contractors.

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            To say they have nothing going for them and are being propped up by the government is not at all accurate

            That isn’t what they’re saying though, is it? They’re saying that SpaceX has the ability to fail more than NASA, because they’re not a government organization funded solely by taxes.

            • jacksilver@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Admittedly I think the biggest failures that hurt NASA were incidents when people, not rockets, blew up. It’ll be interesting to see if things change if/when there is a death from a SpaceX rocket.

              • jasondj@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                People die in work related incidents all the time. The only thing different about deaths from NASA incidents is that they are (usually) spectacular incidents (like massive explosions or cabin fires…not good things, just stunning) and high-profile.

                SpaceX does well because they basically ignore Elon.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          He also seems to have the idea that the best developer is the one who produces the most code. That shows a pretty major lack of understanding of how software development works. Sometimes the best day is when you produce negative amounts of code.