time for big bang revision
‘Forbidden’ black holes? What wrote this headline?
space.com usual clickbait. half expected them to talk about hungry black holes. not too bad of an article
is this the starting point of a new cosmology ?
https://lemmy.world/post/17053001(physicists) …these luminous objects do not quite fit comfortably into those theories. …
Those objects fit comfortably in reality but those theories (Big Bang, LCDM…) do not.
source // open access :
RUBIES: Evolved Stellar Populations with Extended Formation Histories at z ∼ 7–8 in Candidate Massive Galaxies Identified with JWST/NIRSpec https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7seem to need some revision. that’s what I like about science. observations revise theories. no unchangable beliefs.
