• flamingos-cant@feddit.ukM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    But for Labour in government, it is not just a dividing line with the Tories but also what it sees as its most powerful attack on the new electoral threat from the Greens. Political strategists plan to paint the Greens as local blockers to a raft of projects from electricity pylons to affordable housing.

    For a party that won its first council majority in 2023, it amazing how much the the Greens come up in this ‘NIMBY’ discourse. The fact Labour centrists feel the need to take digs at them is encouraging though, it shows that they’re scared of losing ground to the Greens.

    Also, I hate who every was the editor on this article, YIMBY / NIMBY are acronyms, they should be spelt in all caps.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Last year, I called out a friend for excessively blaming the Greens for various local council decisions/inefficiencies. They had the impression that the Greens had far more seats than they actually did (iirc, they only had 2, out of a total of almost 40). When I pointed this out to them, they were surprised, and we later reflected that they had likely inadvertently bought into propaganda that scapegoats the Greens.

      One of the projects that the Greens had most loudly been opposed to in the area was one that looked like some genuinely pretty dodgy developments as part of a failing scheme led by councillors who had approved a bunch of other half complete failures.

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      The Greens very much do run on nimby platforms, including their co-leader, mentioned in the article. And it is just deeply aggravating when they oppose green infrastructure for nimby reasons, whether it wins them votes or not.

      Also, lots of words start off as acronyms and then lose that status. ‘Laser’ is a good example: originally ‘Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation’, but now always written in lowercase.

      • flamingos-cant@feddit.ukM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Also, lots of words start off as acronyms and then lose that status. ‘Laser’ is a good example: originally ‘Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation’, but now always written in lowercase.

        But we generally only do that for acronyms that become familiar and well know (scuba, taser, etc). The article itself feels the need to spell out what it stands for and putting it in lower case just reeks of trying to manufacture that familiarity and the legitimacy such familiarity carries.

        • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, it’s a fair point. I think the downside of caps is that it feels like the article is screaming at you!