• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The difference might be in primates in captivity learning from humans using tools around them all day every day. Primate see primate do trial and error.

    One seen doing it spontaneously in nature might be more significant.

    • Devi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nah, I’ve never been in the monkey house chewing ginger roots, they know this stuff, or work it out, not sure which really.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      The difference might be in primates in captivity learning from humans using tools around them all day every day. Primate see primate do trial and error.

      I don’t get it. I highly doubt zookeepers tend to pick medicinal plants from the habitats in lieu of popping a painkiller. Otherwise how would using a shovel teach a monkey to use plants to treat a scratch for example?

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I don’t mean it that literally. I mean just observing swaths of people putting straws into drinks, putting ointments on scrapes, etc might make them extrapolate and try similar actions using what’s available to them.

        It’s not much of a reach for a primate seeing a human manipulate and dig with a shovel, and use that as inspiration to manipulate a bamboo shoot to scratch their own back.

        We homosapiens spent 180,000 ish years wandering around in the dirt like idiots before it occurred to some of us that we could grow food in one place, thus beginning the path to civilization. Even we need examples to extrapolate from.