For me it’s gotta be Click, I’ll take a magic remote over an old sled any day of the week. Plus Click is way funnier and more profound.
Edit: Ooo controversial, I’m going to start taking the upvotes to mean Click and the downvotes to mean Citizen Kane
I can honestly say that I would just not watch movies anymore.
Comedy is the quickest to age, and the most likely to age poorly. I’d pick Citizen Kane.
Also, I’d basically never watch movies again. I’d watch plays, TV shows, web videos… I’d listen to radio, play video games, read books… And I’d curse whatever god took the Princess Bride away from me.
This is just asking which movie you prefer, with extra steps.
It’s easy for people to say they prefer one over the other due to a difference of prestige, but when it really comes down to it I’m curious what people actually prefer
This is again just asking which movie you prefer, with extra steps!
Necessary steps, I believe
What movie do you prefer for real’z tho?
Most people are busy skipping time with their remote, so phrasing the question that way isn’t nearly enough to escape the autopilot response. I want them to hit play first
I’m just floored by this premise.
Like, you’re hell-bent on cutting through the noise, employing every psychological trick in your tool belt to snap “the glassy-eyed zombified doomscrolling masses” back to a fully engaged state.
… and once you’ve snapped them back into reality… once you’ve freed them from the matrix, the great question you have for them is “do you like Citizen Kane or Click more?”
Yes
I dunno, there some necessary context here. I think Requiem for a Dream is a better movie then Iron Man, but I sure as hell wouldn’t pick it as the only movie I’m ever going to watch again.
Asking you which movie you would rapidly come to extremely hate the least.
I want my answer counted as Citizen Kane, but I’ve never seen it and my actual answer is that I would just watch the Orson Welles wine commercial outtakes for my desert island times.
Ahhhh the French… Champagne
Now you’re talking real cinema. MAHAAAAA the French… champagne… has always been celebrated for its excellence
It took twelve years to make!
Drunk Orson Welles is my spirit animal. Everytime the drinks come rolling in I always say that line. Doesn’t matter that it’s not wine.
Did you know that he wasn’t drunk? He had taken a sleeping pill or something and accidentally had to stay awake. After the couple bad takes they let him take a power nap and then they did a legit take of the commercial and he delivered it totally normal, it’s even on YouTube. Blew my mind a few months ago when I learned that the first time myself
That is very surprising. I always assumed it was a situation of him drinking the product on set, like that episode of Bojack Horseman where Todd drinks a bunch of bourbon while filming a commercial
Yeah, I mean it’s for a wine commercial so you instantly think, he’s fucking wasted. And he was! But for a different reason lol. Look it up on YouTube, his like actual take of the interview, it’s really trippy seeing him say all that stuff totally straight for once
Okay, it took me a while but I finally found the actual commercial: https://youtu.be/tKe_0KhJsBs
You’re right! I must have watched the blooper reel a hundred times at this point, and hearing the lines delivered properly is bizarre.
Wait, so is this a scenario where I get to watch that film, then I suddenly die as soon as it ends? Or do I get to watch it on repeat for all years to come? Or do I watch that movie once and never watch any movie ever after that point? Or do I get to watch the movie once, but it’s slowed down to fit the rest of my lifespan?
I mean, my answer is Citizen Kane either way.
Damn. Asking the real questions
Neither. I’d rather sit in silence.
I know what Citizen Kane represents, its artistic significance, all that jazz. I studied cinema for a short while as an undergrad, I watched it a couple of times, studied many parts with teachers. It still bores me to death.
Click is entertaining, but it would bore me to death after a week.
Can we answer “no movies at all”?
I haven’t seen either of them, so this is something of a gamble lol.
I always had vibes of why Click is so bad, that it cheats at evoking emotion, that the main character is an ass and still doesn’t earn his torture–and that torture goes on and on and on and …!–and that he doesn’t even learn any valuable lessons in the end!
Then Big Joel did me the favor of analyzing why Click is so terrible. So yeah, even without seeing CK, the choice is laughably easy.
I’ve never seen Citizen Kane, but I find it hard to believe that Click is “more profound” lol. It’s pretty straight forward as far as scifi goes. I agree that it has a surprisingly emotional ending, but I don’t think that speaks to it’s profundity, but more to it’s relatability.
I would hope there would be more to glean from CK after many watches: the writing would have subtext, the cinematography is more deliberate. Click is pretty much exactly what it says it is, you can easily get the full value out of it from a single viewing.
So my pick would be Citizen Kane. Or nothing, as someone else said.
Scifi?! Click ain’t anything close to scifi. Its a magic remote. Given by a magic shop. Genre-wise it plays more like a horror comedy. Monkey hand -kinda horror.
Also Citizen Kane isn’t worth watching for most people. About a journalist making storm in a water glass over something that had a lot simpler explanation. Cinematic it has a lot of good tricks… For its time! Those tricks are taught to first year movie maker students, and are today used EVERYWHERE, so much that you barely notice it anymore. Click have definitely used the same tricks, and 80 years more of cinematic tricks. If you had to choose only one to learn from, you should choose Click.
It sounds like you agree with me on both points 👍.
Sci-fi isn’t about the science (which is often hand-waved away completely), it’s about the philosophical implications of the hypothetical technology. And as famous scifi writer Arthur C. Clarke put it, “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”
I also said that Click is the move that has more relatability, which is the same as saying, “Citizen Kane isn’t worth watching for most people”.
The point that CK’s “tricks” are outdated, commonplace, and also used by Click is completely valid though.
it’s about the philosophical implications of the hypothetical technology.
And the movie isn’t about the remote or its philosophical implications on society or a person. It is just a MacGuffin to deliver the lesson. Click is about the guy and his wishes coming true in the worst way. A common, old horror trope. Which is why I think it isnt technically scifi.
(I know genres can be a bit subjective. But I find it fun to discuss stuff and test my assumptions.)
Heh, well, the genre of Click is not a hill I’m about to die on, but suffice it to say, I think we could find many a sci-fi (that we both agree are sci-fi) that purely hinge on the formula of: macguffin enables some quirk in reality, and the rest of the story is exploring how the main character(s) behave in response.
Wikipedia calls it science fantasy, which I disagree with.
This guy gets it. People here think I’m joking lol
I won’t say you’re wrong, everyone has their opinion but I recommend watching Citizen Kane before deciding it’s worth abandoning Click for. You might watch it once and curse the heavens that you didn’t pick an Adam Sandler classic
I recommend watching Citizen Kane before deciding it’s worth abandoning Click for.
Oh internet, never change lol.
Personally I don’t consider Click to be a Sandler “classic”, Click came much later once he started into the romcom scene. But yeah, I should watch CK before I make the most important decision of my life. Who knows, maybe I’ll want a do-over.
Citizen Kane because it’s the better film.
You spelled Clue wrong
I’ll take it
Since I don’t know what “Click” is, I’m going with Citizen Kane.
It would be a very short life.
Click, it’s a good movie. Adam Sandler has made bad movies but this isn’t one of them.
I think Citizen Kane is going to be too old for me to relate to its presentation style.
